MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Considering Evidence-based Practice

2001· article· en· W2040348371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Nurse Practitioner · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Sciences Research and Education
Canadian institutionsKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoneLibrary scienceAssociate editorSession (web analytics)Art historyArtWorld Wide WebComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABOUT THE AUTHOR Barbara Ritter, CNS,FNP,MS,EdD(c) is a graduate nursing instructor, University of San Francisco, Calif. "The definitive source for professional information" This article originally appeared in the California Coalition of Nurse Practitioners Connection Newsletter 1998;10. NP News Editor-in-Chief: Linda Pearson, RN, FNP, MSN Department Editor: Marilyn Edmunds, NP, PhD Editorial Director: Kimberly Callan Associate Editor: Lorna Sapp Murray Copy Editors: Nadia Blahut, Thomas Mitchell Art Director: Lisa A. Witter Readers wishing to report news or story ideas should contact Lorna Sapp Murray, NP News, 1111 Bethlehem Pike, P.O. Box 908, Springhouse, PA 19477; phone, 215-646-8700, ext. 1291; fax, 215-654-1365; E-mail, [email protected].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.283
GPT teacher head0.545
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it