Synthesis, IR, and multinuclear NMR spectroscopic studies of complexes of the type <i>cis</i>- and <i>trans</i>-Pt(amine)<sub>2</sub>(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compounds of the types cis- and trans-Pt(amine) 2 NO 3 ) 2 have been synthesized and characterized by IR and multinuclear ( 195 Pt, 13 C, and 1 H) NMR spectroscopies. The nitrato IR bands were compared for the two isomers. The 195 Pt NMR resonances of the trans complexes were observed at lower fields (avg. 1570 ppm for primary amines) than the cis analogues (avg. 1698 ppm) for an average Δδ value of 124 ppm. The complexes containing a secondary amine were observed at about the same field for the cis isomers (avg. 1682 ppm) and surprisingly at much higher fields for the trans compounds (avg. 1638 ppm). In 1 H NMR, the coupling constants 2 J( 195 Pt- 1 HN) are larger for the cis isomers (avg. 67 Hz) than for the trans compounds (avg. 58 Hz). The 3 J( 195 Pt- 1 H) are also larger for the cis complexes (avg. 40 vs. 33 Hz). In 13 C NMR, the coupling constants are also geometry dependent. The 3 J( 195 Pt- 13 C) are larger for the cis isomers (avg. 37 Hz) than for the trans compounds (avg. 28 Hz). The 2 J( 195 Pt- 13 C) are much smaller (avg. 18 Hz for the cis complexes and 16 Hz for the trans isomers).Key words: platinum, amine, nitrato, NMR, IR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it