Pivoting system fracture in a bileaflet mechanical valve: A case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A leaflet escape occurred in a low profile bileaflet mechanical prosthesis manufactured by TRI-Technologies that had been implanted for 3 years in the mitral position of a 32 year old patient. The escaped leaflet had embolized and was subsequently located by an abdominal computerized axial tomography scan and ultrasound in the terminal portion of the aortic bifurcation. The embolized leaflet was removed 3 months after valve replacement surgery. In an attempt to determine the cause of the escape the retrieved embolized leaflet was investigated. Techniques employed included visual examination aided by stereo-microscopy, x-ray imaging and scanning electron microscopy. One of the ears had fractured and was missing from the leaflet. Chipping was observed at the leaflet ear position on both the inflow and outflow surfaces. Visual and SEM observations found fractographic river-lines that indicated an apparent origin at the inflow surface of the ear nearest to the straight 'B-datum' line or coaptation edge. The origin seemed to be in the radius between the leaflet ear and the leaflet body. SEM observation of the remaining intact ear showed wear marks on both the inflow and outflow sides of the leaflet ear that corresponded to the suspected origin of fracture. It is believed that the use of boron alloyed pyrolytic carbon material and the leaflet's homogeneous monolithic structural design were factors that contributed to this adverse event.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".