Higher Risk of Neutropenia Associated With Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared With Ticarcillin-Clavulanate in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A series of cases of piperacillin-tazobactam (P/T)-associated neutropenia has been observed recently in children in our center. Because neutropenia was seldom observed in children treated with ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (T/C), we conducted a study to determine if there is an increased risk of neutropenia in children exposed to P/T in comparison with T/C. METHODS: Medical records of subjects aged <18 years who received at least 1 dose of P/T or T/C between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2011 were reviewed. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine episodes of treatment (65 P/T, 234 T/C) met inclusion criteria. Among those episodes, 213 had data allowing complete white blood cell count analysis and were included in the final analysis. Thirteen cases of neutropenia were observed during the study period. The average time to onset was 17.6 days and all patients were aged <13 years. Seven cases (10.8%) occurred in the P/T group and 6 (2.6%) in the T/C group (unadjusted odds ratio, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-14.17). Although a statistically significant correlation was observed between age, treatment duration, and total dose and the development of neutropenia (r = -0.121, P = .037; r = 0.267, P < .001; r = 0.260, P < .001, respectively), this was not the case for sex, indications, neutrophil count at initiation, and concomitant drug treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Although our results need to be confirmed, they suggest that children receiving long courses of therapy (>2 weeks) with P/T may be at increased risk of neutropenia, compared with T/C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".