Undrained anisotropy of Hostun RF loose sand: new experimental investigations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The undrained behaviour of loose and overconsolidated Hostun RF sand in triaxial compression and extension tests is described. The samples are isotropically or anisotropically overconsolidated along several constant effective stress ratio paths with various overconsolidation ratios (OCR), up to 24. To minimize the effect of variation of density on the observed undrained behaviour, all tested samples are required to have a nearly identical void ratio before the final monotonic undrained shearing. Isotropically overconsolidated and normally consolidated samples exhibit the same phenomenon of partial static liquefaction, but anisotropically overconsolidated specimens reveal a completely different undrained behaviour. A common pseudoelastic response is observed for a given overconsolidation history. This response is induced by recent stress history in terms of effective stress paths, independent of the OCR during overconsolidation. The initial gradient of the effective stress paths seems to depend solely on the direction of the previous linear stress path history. This paper offers a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of the induced anisotropy of loose sand created by simple linear stress paths from three different initial stress states in the classical triaxial plane. The pseudoelastic response can be adequately modelled by a simple hyperelastic component of the elastoplastic framework.Key words: induced anisotropy, overconsolidation, instability, laboratory undrained tests, sand, hyperelasticity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".