MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040561700 · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705474

Electrophysiological evidence for a gradient of G protein‐gated K<sup>+</sup> current in adult mouse atria

2003· article· en· W2040561700 on OpenAlexaff
Alan Lomax, Robert A. Rose, Wayne R. Giles

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Pharmacology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyCarbacholMuscarinic acetylcholine receptorChemistryPirenzepineElectrophysiologyMyocyteAcetylcholineMethoctramineStimulationReceptorBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole cell current and voltage clamp techniques were used to examine the properties of acetylcholine-sensitive K+ current (IKACh) in myocytes from adult mouse atrium. Superfusion of a maximal dose of carbachol (CCh; 10 microM) caused a substantial increase in K+ current in all myocytes examined. The current-voltage (I-V) relation of maximally activated IKACh exhibited weak inward rectification. Consequently, CCh increased the amount of depolarising current necessary to evoke action potentials (APs), and APs evoked in CCh had significantly shorter durations than control APs (P<0.05). The effects of CCh on K+ current and on AP properties were blocked by the muscarinic receptor antagonist methoctramine (1 microM). ACh (10 microM) activated a K+ current with identical properties to that activated by CCh, as did the A1 receptor agonist adenosine (100 microM). Right atrial myocytes had significantly more IKACh than left atrial myocytes (P<0.05), regardless of whether IKACh was evoked by superfusion of muscarinic or A1 receptor agonists. IKACh current density was significantly higher in SA node myocytes than either right or left atrial myocytes. These data identify a gradient of IKACh current density across the supraventricular structures of mouse heart. This gradient, combined with the heterogeneous distribution of parasympathetic innervation of the atria, may contribute to the proarrhythmic ability of vagal nerve stimulation to augment dispersion of atrial refractoriness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of PharmacologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207