The Role of the ϵ Subunit in the Escherichia coli ATP Synthase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of the C-domain of the epsilon subunit of ATP synthase was investigated by fusing either the 20-kDa flavodoxin (Fd) or the 5-kDa chitin binding domain (CBD) to the N termini of both full-length epsilon and a truncation mutant epsilon(88-stop). All mutant epsilon proteins were stable in cells and supported F1F0 assembly. Cells expressing the Fd-epsilon or Fd-epsilon(88-stop) mutants were unable to grow on acetate minimal medium, indicating their inability to carry out oxidative phosphorylation because of steric blockage of rotation. The other forms of epsilon supported growth on acetate. Membrane vesicles containing Fd-epsilon showed 23% of the wild type ATPase activity but no proton pumping, suggesting that the ATP synthase is intrinsically partially uncoupled. Vesicles containing CBD-epsilon were indistinguishable from the wild type in ATPase activity and proton pumping, indicating that the N-terminal fusions alone do not promote uncoupling. Fd-epsilon(88-stop) caused higher rates of uncoupled ATP hydrolysis than Fd-epsilon, and epsilon(88-stop) showed an increased rate of membrane-bound ATP hydrolysis but decreased proton pumping relative to the wild type. Both results demonstrate the role of the C-domain in coupling. Analysis of the wild type and epsilon(88-stop) mutant membrane ATPase activities at concentrations of ATP from 50 mum to 8 mm showed no significant dependence of the ratio of bound/released ATPase activity on ATP concentration. These results support the hypothesis that the main function of the C-domain in the Escherichia coli epsilon subunit is to reduce uncoupled ATPase activity, rather than to regulate coupled activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".