MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advances in Mobile Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2000· article· en· W2040578968 on OpenAlexaffabout
Taro Kaibara, John K. Saunders, Garnette R. Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingElectromagnetic coilMagnetOperating tableRadiofrequency coilShielded cableElectromagnetic shieldingRetractorSurgeryRadiologyTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to enhance a mobile magnetic resonance imaging system developed for neurosurgery. Components of the system included an actively shielded, 1.5-T superconducting magnet, a titanium operating room table, a radiofrequency (RF) head coil that could be disassembled, and local RF shielding. METHODS: The system was designed and implemented by the Division of Neurosurgery, University of Calgary (Calgary, Alberta, Canada), in collaboration with the National Research Council of Canada Institute for Biodiagnostics (Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada). The ceiling-mounted, 1.5-T magnet was moved into and out of the surgical field as required. After initial success in monitoring the resection of various intracranial and cranial base lesions, significant modifications to the system were made by Innovative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems, Inc. (Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada), and BrainLAB (Heimstetten, Germany). These modifications included the design and construction of a shorter magnet with a larger bore and stronger gradients, widening of the titanium operating room table, modification of the RF coil housing to allow vertical movement and incorporation of a three-pin head-clamp, construction of a transparent, copper-impregnated RF shield, and integration with a surgical navigation system. RESULTS: The movable intraoperative imaging system has now been used for 101 neurosurgical procedures, including the previously reported cases. CONCLUSION: The modifications to the system have enhanced its integration with established neurosurgical techniques and have improved patient safety. The larger magnet bore size, together with the ability to move the RF coil vertically, allows placement of patients in prone or lateral positions. Surgical navigation has been successfully integrated with the intraoperatively acquired high-resolution images. The ability to identify and resect residual lesions before wound closure remains a tremendous immediate advantage of this technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207