MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040610561 · doi:10.1021/ja028109p

The ATCUN Domain as a Probe of Intermolecular Interactions:  Application to Calmodulin−Peptide Complexes

2002· article· en· W2040610561 on OpenAlexaff
Tapas K. Mal, Mitsuhiko Ikura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCalmodulinPeptideMyosin light-chain kinaseKinaseIntermolecular forceProtein kinase domainProtein kinase ABiochemistryBiophysicsStereochemistryComputational biologyMyosinMoleculeEnzymeBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The utility of a three-residue Cu2+ binding motif (ATCUN domain) for studying intermolecular interactions is demonstrated. By comparing a set of 1H-15N correlation spectra recorded on complexes of calmodulin (CaM) and peptides with the ATCUN tag in the presence and absence of Cu2+ the two possible canonical binding orientations of the peptide can be rapidly distinguished. The methodology is confirmed with studies of complexes of CaM and peptides from myosin light chain kinase and CaM kinase kinase, for which high-resolution structures are available, and then applied to a complex with CaM kinase I for which structural data has not been obtained. The orientation of the CaM kinase I and myosin light chain kinase peptides are shown to be identical. In the case of a complex of CaM with a peptide for which structural information is not available, the present methodology, in combination with 1H-15N residual dipolar couplings measured on CaM, and the database of existing CaM-peptide structures, allows a homology model to be built rapidly and with confidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207