MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040612026 · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezv076

An unusual case of native mitral valve thrombosis and obstruction

2015· article· en· W2040612026 on OpenAlexaff
Elsayed Elmistekawy, Vivian Chan, Aurélien Lambert, Thierry Mesana

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitral valveThrombosisCardiologyInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The patient is a 42-year old female known to have mitral stenosis. She had a history of systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. Echocardiogram showed a mean mitral gradient of 27 mmHg (Fig. 1 A and B). She became haemodynamically unstable. At surgery, the mitral valve was found to be covered by a fresh thrombus obstructing almost the entire orifice (Fig. 2 A– C). Echocardiography of a patient in extremis with acute native mitral valve thrombosis. ( A ) A four-chamber transoesophageal image, which shows mitral leaflet thickening and significant tricuspid valve regurgitation. ( B ) An elevated transmitral gradient. Pathologic mitral valve specimen. ( A ) The atrial surface of the resected mitral valve with a thrombus (open arrow) obstructing almost the entire mitral orifice. A 2-mm orifice was observed (dark arrow). ( B ) The ventricular surface of the resected mitral valve showing thrombus formation (open arrow) and a thickened subvalvular apparatus (dark arrow). ( C ) The atrial surface of the freshly resected mitral valve with the thrombus (open arrow) obstructing almost the entire mitral orifice. The authors thank Eric Belanger and Mark Hynes, from the University of Ottawa heart Institute, Canada, for their assistance with this case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0140.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207