MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040620427 · doi:10.5539/jas.v6n6p1

Inheritance of Seed Protein Subunits of Common Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) Cultivar Sobano and Its Homostylous Wild Type

2014· article· en· W2040620427 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jianhui Li, Qingfu Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeed and Plant Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEarmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research SystemNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFagopyrumBiologyEndospermAcheneHybridLocus (genetics)BotanyAlleleCotyledonGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The seed protein subunits of common buckwheat Sobano (Fagopyrum esculentum) and its homostylous wild type “HOMO” (F.esculentum var. homotropicum) were studied by means of SDS-PAGE analysis. The results showed that there are 33 bands of seed protein subunits in Sobano and 31 bands in HOMO. Most of them were found in the cotyledon and a few in the endosperm. There are nine subunits in Sobano seeds and ten subunits in HOMO. The inheritance analysis of the seed protein subunits in progenies of hybrids between Sobano and HOMO showed that there are four pairs of protein subunits controlled by a single co-dominant allele. The genetic analysis of morphological characters indicated that homostyly, shattering and acute achenes are controlled by different dominant single genes. The shattering gene has a linkage to the homostyly locus in a rate of 7.81% and to the allele PS44/PS42.9 in a rate of 22.54%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicSeed and Plant BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207