Triggering of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca<sup>2+</sup>release and contraction by reverse mode Na<sup>+</sup>/Ca<sup>2+</sup>exchange in trout atrial myocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Whole cell patch clamp and intracellular Ca(2+) transients in trout atrial cardiomyocytes were used to quantify calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and examine its dependency on the Ca(2+) trigger source. Short depolarization pulses (2-20 ms) elicited large caffeine-sensitive tail currents. The Ca(2+) carried by the caffeine-sensitive tail current after a 2-ms depolarization was 0.56 amol Ca(2+)/pF, giving an SR Ca(2+) release rate of 279 amol Ca(2+). pF(-1). s(-1) or 4.3 mM/s. Depolarizing cells for 10 ms to different membrane potentials resulted in a local maximum of SR Ca(2+) release, intracellular Ca(2+) transient, and cell shortening at 10 mV. Although 100 microM CdCl(2) abolished this local maximum, it had no effect on SR Ca(2+) release elicited by a depolarization to 110 or 150 mV, and the SR Ca(2+) release was proportional to the membrane potential in the range -50 to 150 mV with 100 microM CdCl(2). Increasing the intracellular Na(+) concentration ([Na(+)]) from 10 to 16 mM enhanced SR Ca(2+) release but reduced cell shortening at all membrane potentials examined. In the absence of TTX, SR Ca(2+) release was potentiated with 16 mM but not 10 mM pipette [Na(+)]. Comparison of the total sarcolemmal Ca(2+) entry and the Ca(2+) released from the SR gave a gain factor of 18.6 +/- 7.7. Nifedipine (Nif) at 10 microM inhibited L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca)) and reduced the time integral of the tail current by 61%. The gain of the Nif-sensitive SR Ca(2+) release was 16.0 +/- 4.7. A 2-ms depolarization still elicited a contraction in the presence of Nif that was abolished by addition of 10 mM NiCl(2). The gain of the Nif-insensitive but NiCl(2)-sensitive SR Ca(2+) release was 14.8 +/- 7.1. Thus both reverse-mode Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange (NCX) and I(Ca) can elicit Ca(2+) release from the SR, but I(Ca) is more efficient than reverse-mode NCX in activating contraction. This difference may be due to extrusion of a larger fraction of the Ca(2+) released from the SR by reverse-mode NCX rather than a smaller gain for NCX-induced Ca(2+) release.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".