MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040704216 · doi:10.1242/jcs.00996

Contractile filament architecture and force transmission in swine airway smooth muscle

2004· article· en· W2040704216 on OpenAlexaff
Kuo‐Hsing Kuo, Chun Y. Seow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyActinProtein filamentMyosinTreadmillingBiophysicsAnatomyNucleusMyofilamentSyncytiumIntermediate filamentCytoskeletonCell biologyMicrofilamentCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that the cyclic interaction of myosin cross bridges with actin filaments is responsible for force and shortening generation in smooth muscle. The intracellular organization of contractile filaments, however, is still poorly understood. Here, we show electron microscopic and functional evidence that contractile filaments in airway smooth muscle lie parallel to the longitudinal axis of the cell bundle, in contrast to the obliquely arranged filaments depicted in conventional models. The parallel arrangement of contractile filaments is maintained despite the fact that individual cells are spindle-shaped. This is accomplished through filament attachment to membrane-associated dense plaques that are in turn connected to similar structures on neighboring cells. Intracellularly, the parallel arrangement is maintained despite the centrally located nucleus. This is accomplished by attachment of actin filaments to the nuclear envelope and making the nucleus a force transmitting structure. The results suggest that smooth muscle cells in tissue form a mechanical syncytium and are able to function properly only as a group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cell ScienceSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207