MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040741470 · doi:10.1163/156856202320176510

Cytotoxic reaction and TNF-α response of macrophages to polyurethane particles

2002· article· en· W2040741470 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsViability assayPolyurethaneBiomaterialIncubationMacrophageMaterials scienceIn vitroIncubation periodParticle sizeBiophysicsInflammatory responseImmunologyChemistryNanotechnologyBiologyComposite materialInflammationBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Their unique mechanical and biological properties make polyurethanes (PUs) ideal materials for many implantable devices. However, uncertain long-term biostability in the human physiological environment limits their extensive clinical applications. Chronic inflammatory response associated with macrophage activation has been suggested as a prime factor; although the mechanism of macrophage activation in response to biomaterial surfaces and debris is still unknown. The overall objective of this work was to study the response of macrophages to PU materials in vitro by measuring cell viability and activity. The studies were carried out using phagocytozable-size PU particles from three types of commercially-available PUs: Pellethane 2363 80ABA (PL); Tecothane TT2065 (TC65); and Tecothane TT2085 (TC85). These polymers posess the same generic composition but differ in the length of hard and soft segments, as revealed by the FTIR and NMR studies. The results showed that PU particles affected both viability and activity of J774 macrophages. The percentage of mortality ranged from 1 to 15% with 10-100 microg ml(-1) of particles after 24 and 48 h incubation. These three types of particles induced different mortality on the macrophages. Specifically, the mortality with PL particles was 1-4% (p > 0.05), while the mortality with TC85 particles was 2-10% (p < 0.05) and 4-15% with TC65 (p < 0.05). Conversely, these particles also affected cell proliferation. Cell numbers increased by 132 and 167% after 24 and 48 h incubation, respectively, without particles, whereas the cell numbers increased only 46 and 78% with TC65, 66 and 105% with TC85, and 67 and 110% with PL in the presence of 100 microg ml(-1) of particles for the respective incubation times. PU particles also increased TNF-alpha release from macrophage. After having been incubated for 24 h with 100 microg ml(-1) particles of TC65, TC85, and PL, macrophages release TNF-alpha 7.4, 5.2, and 4.1 times more than the control. In conclusion, PU particles had cytotoxic effects on J774 macrophage at high concentrations. The order of macrophage response for three types of particles was TC65 > TC85 > PL. PU particles' effect on macrophage viability and activity depends on the concentration of particles and their chemical composition, especially on the ratio of hard to soft segments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it