MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040772370 · doi:10.1097/ftd.0b013e31816ba73a

Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Sirolimus in Children

2008· review· en· W2040772370 on OpenAlexaff
Guido Filler, Jamie Bendrick‐Peart, Uwe Christians

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Drug Monitoring · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsMycophenolatePharmacokineticsSirolimusMedicineMycophenolic acidTherapeutic drug monitoringArea under the curvePharmacologyTacrolimusGastroenterologyInternal medicineUrologyTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics in children and youths of 2 commonly used immunosuppressive drugs, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (Sir), as presented at the IATDMCT 2007 conference. The review focuses on the developmental changes of drug disposition during childhood and adolescence. Regarding mycophenolate mofetil, the authors were unable to demonstrate age dependency of MMF in combination with cyclosporine. By contrast, there was an inverse relationship between age and the dose-normalized mycophenolate (MPA) area-under-the-time-concentration curve (AUC) in children who received concomitant tacrolimus (Tac). Dose-normalized MPA AUCs were higher than commonly observed in adult patients. It can be hypothesized that the age dependency is related to developmental changes in the expression of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Sirolimus half-life and mean residence time (MRT) are shorter than in adults. Similar to that in adults, there is a profound drug-drug interaction between cyclosporine and Sir. In our own experience, Sir was started at 0.13 +/- 0.05 mg/kg/day. The average Sir AUC was 64.9 +/- 29.7 ng*h/mL. The median (range) AUC for each metabolite was as follows: 12-hydroxy-Sir, 7.6 (0.2-18.8); 46-hydroxy-Sir, 3.1 (0.0-12.4); 24-hydroxy-Sir, 4.3 (0.0-12.6); piperidine-hydroxy-Sir, 3.5 (0.0-8.3); 39-desmethyl-Sir, 3.6 (0.0-11.3); 16-desmethyl-Sir, 5.0 (0.1-9.9); and di-hydroxy-Sir, 4.3 (0.0-32.5) ng*h/mL. Of the total metabolite AUC, 77.5% was due to hydroxylated metabolites, while 39-O-desmethyl Sir (the main metabolite in adults) comprised only 8.4% of the metabolites. This is clinically relevant, as 39-O-desmethyl Sir shows 86% to 127% cross-reactivity with the Sir immunoassay. Metabolites reached a median AUC of 60% of that of Sir, but the range was 2.6% to 136%. The age dependency of Sir metabolite formation was confirmed in a human liver microsome model. On the basis of the age dependency of piperidine-hydroxy Sir, the authors postulate that the ontogeny of the drug disposition can be largely explained by developmental changes of the CYP2C8 expression. In conclusion, both Sir and MMF drug disposition vary in children and adolescents from adult patients, most likely because of developmental changes of biliary transporters and metabolic enzymes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Drug MonitoringSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207