A Simple High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Assay for Simultaneous Measurement of Adenosine, Guanosine, and the Oxypurine Metabolites in Plasma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study the effect of pharmacologic agents on the biologic fate of adenosine, a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay coupled with a solid-phase extraction (SPE) method was developed for simultaneous determination of plasma adenosine, hypoxanthine, xanthine, inosine, guanosine, and uric acid. The HPLC system consisted of a reversed phase C18 column, UV detector set at 254 nm, and a mobile phase composed of 0.01 M ammonium phosphate: methanol (9.5 : 0.5) vol/vol with the final pH adjusted to 3.9. The standard curves were linear between 0.1-2 microg/mL for all the analytes (except uric acid 50-400 microg/mL), with r2 > 0.99. The absolute recoveries were >60% and accuracy >85% in almost all cases. The limit of detection was <1 ng based on absolute injection of the analytes. The intraassay variations were <10% and interassay variations <15%. The presence of a wide range of medications in plasma samples did not interfere with the assay. The assay was applied successfully to measure plasma adenosine and the oxypurine metabolites in humans and rats. It was noted that plasma concentrations of adenosine and the oxypurine metabolites can vary considerably depending on the method of blood sample collection, and that species differences are apparent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".