Fetal anatomic survey using three‐dimensional ultrasound in conjunction with first‐trimester nuchal translucency screening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the visualization rates of fetal anatomic structures by three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) at 12-13 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study of women presenting for nuchal translucency ultrasound. Five 3D volumes of the fetus were acquired transabdominally. Two investigators independently reviewed the stored volumes offline following a standardized protocol. RESULTS: One hundred singleton fetuses were examined. The mean time for 3D volumes acquisition was 4.8 min; and for 3D review 17 min. Anatomic structures were seen as follows: cranium, lateral cerebral ventricles and abdominal wall 100%; stomach, vertebrae, upper and lower limbs >or= 94%; face 71%, bladder 58%, both kidneys 39%, skin overlying spine 26% and heart 18%. Agreement between two observers ranged from 100% (for head, abdominal wall and lower limbs) to 43% (for visualization of skin overlying spine). A complete basic anatomic survey was achieved in 11.4% of the 12-week fetuses and 33.3% of the 13-week fetuses (p-value = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester transabdominal 3DUS was adequate for assessment of the head, abdominal wall, stomach, limbs and vertebral alignment. It was less effective for evaluating the heart and intactness of the skin over the spine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".