Ultrastructure of the postcorpus of the esophagus of <i>Teratocephalus lirellus</i> (Teratocephalida) and its use for interpreting character evolution in Secernentea (Nematoda)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ultrastructure of the postcorpus of the putative outgroup of Secernentea (Nematoda), Teratocephalus lirellus (Teratocephalida), is compared with previous observations of representative species Zeldia punctata (Cephalobina), Caenorhabditis elegans (Rhabditina), and Diplenteron sp. (Diplogastrina) in order to interpret the evolution of feeding structures within Secernentea. The postcorpus of T. lirellus consists of 6 marginal, 13 muscle, 3 gland, and 11 nerve cells. In both T. lirellus and Z. punctata, one duct from each of two subventral glands opens into the esophageal lumen at the junction of the isthmus and the basal bulb, whereas in C. elegans and Diplenteron sp., homologous openings are at the posterior end of the median bulb. Caenorhabditis elegans and Z. punctata each have two additional glands that open within the basal bulb. The postcorpus of each taxon has four anterior-to-posterior layered sets of radial muscle cells, except in Diplenteron sp., which lacks a grinder and has homologs to the anterior two sets only. The anterior set of muscles of T. lirellus and Z. punctata includes six mononucleate cells, whereas the homolog in C. elegans and Diplenteron sp. includes three binucleate cells. Evaluation of character polarity defines Rhabditina and Diplogastrina as sister taxa, and suggests that the character of five glands may result from functional convergence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".