MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040877294 · doi:10.1071/rdv22n1ab92

92 CRYOTIPS: A SIMPLE VITRIFICATION TECHNIQUE FOR SHEEP AND GOAT EMBRYOS

2009· article· en· W2040877294 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Gibbons, F. Pereyra-Bonnet, Marcela Isabel Cueto

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitrificationEmbryoEstrous cycleUterine hornsEthylene glycolAnimal scienceAndrologyBiologySemenLaparotomyGlycerolReproductive technologyCryopreservationChemistryAnatomyUterusSurgeryMedicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitrification procedure for embryos has not been used massively because there is not a standard protocol according to species. We evaluated reproductive efficiency of vitrified embryos in plastic tips of micropipettes. Estrous cycles of 36 Criolla goats (donors, n = 10; recipients, n = 26) and 48 Merino sheep (donors, n = 10; recipients, n = 38) were synchronized by sponges containing 60mgof MAP (Progespon®). At sponge removal (goats, Day 18; sheep, Day 14), recipients received 200 UI of eCG (Novormon®, Syntex, Argentina). Sheep and goat donors were superovulated with a total of 80 (igpFSH (Folltropin V®, Bioniche, Canada) every 12 h in 6 decreasing doses (18, 18, 14, 14, 8, 8) during the last 3 days of progestagen treatment. A dose of eCG (200 UI, Novormon®) was applied at progestagen removal. Donors of both species were inseminated by laparoscopy with frozen/thawed semen (200 × 106 spz) 12 to 14h after the onset of estrus. Embryo recovery was done by surgical prepubic laparotomy, and uterine horns were flushed with PBS + 10% SFB at Day 8 after sponge withdrawal. Before vitrification, embryos were kept in commercial embryo holding medium (Syngro, Bioniche, USA) at 25°C. Vitrification solutions were prepared using holding solution (HS) contents, PBS + 20% FBS. Embryos were maintained at 25°C and processed according to the following procedures: (1) HS + 10% glycerol (G) for 5 min, (2) HS +10% G + 20% ethylene glycol (EG) for 5 min, and (3) HS + 25% G + 25% EG for 30 s. Embryos were aspirated in 1 µL of solution 3, into the center of a plastic micropipette tip (0.36 mm inner diameter), and plunged into a cryotube filled with liquid nitrogen. Before embryo transfer, tips were warmed with fingers for 10 s and immersed in 4 dilution steps during 5 min each with 2.5 mL of HS containing (1) 12.5% G+ 12.5% EG+ 0.5 M of sucrose (S), (2) 0.5 M S, (3) 0.25 M S, and (4) HS alone at 25°C. In both species, at Day 8 after sponge withdrawal, 2 embryos of similar stage were transferred. Under laparoscopy view, the tip of the uterine horn was exteriorized by a nontraumatic clamp, through a 1-cm-long midline incision. The embryos were placed into the uterine lumen after punction and the uterine horn was allowed to return to the abdomen (semi-laparoscopic technique). Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography (Aloka 500) at Day 28 after being transferred. Reproduction efficiency in both species is shown in Table 1. This technique proves to be simple and efficient for both ovine embryo stages but only for goat blastocysts and can be used by veterinarians in field conditions at a very low cost. Differences of morulae survival between species require further study. Table 1. Reproductive efficiency after vitrified/warmed embryo transfer in sheep and goats according to the embryo stage

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207