Peripheral P2X receptors and nociception: interactions with biogenic amine systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ATP is implicated in peripheral nociception following activation of P2X, and particularly P2X(3) receptors. The present study examined interactions between alphabeta-methylene-ATP (a P2X(3) receptor ligand) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), noradrenaline (NA) and histamine, following local administration into the hindpaw, on spontaneous pain behaviors and thermal hyperalgesia in Sprague-Dawley rats. The interaction with NA was further explored using systemic 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) and locally administered indomethacin. alphabeta-methylene-ATP produced no spontaneous pain behaviors. Coadministration of 5-HT with alphabeta-methylene-ATP mildly augmented flinching behaviors, while histamine had no such effect. Coadministration of NA with alphabeta-methylene-ATP produced a pronounced expression of flinching and biting/licking behaviors. alphabeta-Methylene-ATP, given alone, produced thermal hyperalgesia, and this was markedly augmented by both 5-HT and NA, but not histamine. 6-OHDA (neurotoxin for sympathetic neurons) and indomethacin (cyclooxygenase inhibitor) reduced the augmenting effect of NA on alphabeta-methylene-ATP-induced thermal hyperalgesia, but had no effect on spontaneous pain behaviors produced by the alphabeta-methylene-ATP/NA combination. Effects of alphabeta-methylene-ATP, NA and their combination were also examined in Long Evans and Wistar rats. In both strains, alphabeta-methylene-ATP and NA both individually led to significant intrinsic flinching behaviors, and the effect of their combination was even more pronounced than in Sprague-Dawley rats. These results provide evidence for: (a) a strong enhancement by NA and 5-HT of nociception produced by peripheral P2X receptors in Sprague-Dawley rats, (b) an indirect action of NA, via sympathetic efferents and prostanoids, with thermal hyperalgesia, and (c) a greater expression of spontaneous pain behaviors with alphabeta-methylene-ATP and NA alone, and with their combination, in Wistar and Long Evans rats compared to Sprague-Dawley rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".