The effect of branched chain amino acids on psychomotor performance during treadmill exercise of changing intensity simulating a soccer game
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was designed to determine changes in the multiple-choice reaction time (MRT) during treadmill running simulating locomotor activity during a soccer game and to examine the effect of branched chain amino acids (BCAA) ingestion on psychomotor performance during the effort. Ten male soccer players were submitted to BCAA and placebo trials at 1-week intervals in a randomized order. BCAA (7 g) or placebo were given 1 h before exercise in a double blind manner. The running test consisted of two 45 min exercise bouts separated by a 15-min passive rest period and the whole test ended with 20-min active recovery. Running-walking speed changed from 0 to 6.4 m·s⁻¹ according to the time-motion analysis of soccer match. During the test, blood samples were taken for lactate, glucose, free fatty acid, and catecholamine determination. Following placebo treatment, MRT shortened from 320 ± 18 to 271 ± 11 ms (p < 0.001) during the first exercise bout then it increased during the resting break to 303 ± 138 ms (p < 0.05). During the second bout, MRT decreased to 280 ± 13 ms (p < 0.001). During active recovery, further shortening of MRT was noted. During BCAA trial, MRT was shorter than during placebo trial by ~10% (p < 0.05) before and during exercise. No significant differences were found between BCAA and placebo trials in biochemical indices. It is concluded that BCAA supplementation might be recommended in sport activities that change in intensity and require quick responses to external signals (e.g., soccer and other team games).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".