MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040931147 · doi:10.1117/12.452345

Generalized moment function and conformal transform

2002· article· en· W2040931147 on OpenAlexaff
Shoude Chang, Chander P. Grover

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentroidArtificial intelligenceObject (grammar)Convolution (computer science)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Moment (physics)Computer visionFeature extractionConformal mapComputer scienceMathematicsGeometryPhysicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new class of generalized moment functions (GMFs) that scan the object with different probing functions. Using the GMF, it is possible to extract a unique geometric point within the object, called the generalized centroid (G-centroid). We can obtain a set of discrete G-centroids from the same object by using different GMFs. The GMFs, which are similar to traditional moment functions, can also be used to describe the global shape of the object, including symmetry and fullness. However, the GMFs, along with the G-centroids, can further serve to construct a feature vector of the object, which is critical to the process of image registration and pattern recognition. Conformal transforms (C-transforms) are another tool used to probe the object by rearranging the latter's mass distribution, without distorting its shape. Using the C-transformed object, it is possible to detect a new mass centroid and G-centroid. More distinguishing feature points can be extracted from the same object by changing the combination of different GMFs and C-transforms. As GMF and centroid detection can be performed by convolution, the centroid and G-centroid can be detected optically in real time. It is also possible to optically implement some of the C-transforms. We present the results of GMF and C-transform applications, including image registration and pattern recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical Polarization and EllipsometryFrench-language works237,207