MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040937974 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m611051200

Establishing a Blueprint for CED-3-dependent Killing through Identification of Multiple Substrates for This Protease

2007· article· en· W2040937974 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca C. Taylor, Gabriela Brumatti, Shu Ito, Michael O. Hengartner, W. Brent Derry, Séamus J. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsCalreticulinCell biologyBiologyProgrammed cell deathCaspaseCaenorhabditis elegansProteomeProteomicsCysteine proteaseProteaseProteolysisProteasesEndoplasmic reticulumChaperone (clinical)ApoptosisBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genetic studies have established that the cysteine protease CED-3 plays a central role in coordinating programmed cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. However, it remains unclear how CED-3 activation results in cell death because few substrates for this protease have been described. We have used a global proteomics approach to seek substrates for CED-3 and have identified 22 worm proteins that undergo CED-3-dependent proteolysis. Proteins that were found to be substrates for CED-3 included the cytoskeleton proteins actin, myosin light chain, and tubulin, as well as proteins involved in ATP synthesis, cellular metabolism, and chaperone function. We estimate that approximately 3% of the C. elegans proteome is susceptible to CED-3-dependent proteolysis. Notably, the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone calreticulin, which has been implicated in the recognition of apoptotic cells by phagocytes, was cleaved by CED-3 and was also cleaved by human caspases during apoptosis. Inhibitors of caspase activity blocked the appearance of calreticulin on the surface of apoptotic cells, suggesting a mechanism for the surface display of calreticulin during apoptosis. Further analysis of these substrates is likely to yield important insights into the mechanism of killing by CED-3 and its human caspase counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsFrench-language works237,207