Synapse composition and organization following chronic activity blockade in cultured hippocampal neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Activity plays multiple roles in the expression of synaptic plasticity, and has been shown to regulate the localization of both neurotransmitter receptors and downstream signaling machinery. However, the role of activity in central synapse formation and organization is incompletely understood. Some studies indicate that synapse formation can occur in the absence of synaptic activity, while others indicate that activity is required for synapse maintenance and receptor recruitment. In addition, the effects of long-term blockade of transmission generally, rather than blockade of specific receptors, on postsynaptic protein complement has been poorly characterized. In order to address the role of activity in synapse formation and postsynaptic specialization, we used tetanus toxin to chronically cleave VAMP2 and inhibit SNARE-mediated neurotransmitter release in cultured hippocampal neurons. Although these neurons are deficient in synaptic release, they are of normal size and morphology. In addition, both excitatory and inhibitory synapses form along their processes with normal density. These synapses have a remarkably similar cellular and molecular organization compared to controls, and are capable of recruiting postsynaptic scaffolding proteins, GABA, and glutamate receptors. Subcellular enrichment of synaptic proteins into specialized domains also appears intact. These data indicate that global activity inhibition is insufficient to disrupt central synapse formation or organization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".