HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH IN THE CIRCUMPOLAR ARCTIC.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ISEE-388 Introduction: An Arctic Council initiative announced in the Iqaluit Declaration (1998) focused on the collection and analysis of biophysical and psychosocial indicator data for children and youth in the eight Arctic countries (Alaska/USA, Canada, Finland, Greenland/Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden). The draft report on the findings was presented to Ministers at their biennial meeting in November 2004 with a view to identifying areas for policy development that would improve the health and well-being of Arctic children and youth. Methods: An expert group, through a series of international meetings, identified and reduced the list of biophysical and psychosocial indicators for children and youth to sixteen. Canada organized the collection and led the analyses of the data with cooperation from the member nations. It tabled a preliminary report in 2001 with 10 policy and scientific conclusions and a draft final report in 2004. Results: Data quality issues (variable definitions and reporting compliance among countries for behavioural indicators such as smoking, substance abuse and breast-feeding) led to major challenges in comparing country data. Small Arctic population sample sizes made regional comparisons and gender and age stratification difficult. Limited data for Russia, nationally and in the northern regions, left the overall Arctic picture incomplete. Large differences were observed between Arctic populations in Canada and Alaska versus the other countries with respect to population youthfulness, breast-feeding rates, incidence of low birth weight, pre-term birth rates, suicides, and unintentional injuries. Other differences in indicator outcomes varied among the regional populations for which data existed and could be compared. Conclusion: There have been significant improvements in the health status of children and youth in many regions of the Arctic. Although it is not useful to over-emphasize the health status disparities between countries, nor should the differences be ignored. There is an urgent need to improve data quality so that future reports on circumpolar populations and policy options for addressing disparities are based on more complete data of known high quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".