MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041118050 · doi:10.1021/ic0014078

Rare-Earth Germanium Antimonides <i>RE</i><sub>6</sub>Ge<sub>5</sub><sub>-</sub><i><sub>x</sub></i>Sb<sub>11+</sub><i><sub>x</sub></i> (<i>RE</i> = La−Nd, Sm, Gd−Dy). II. Magnetic and Transport Properties

2001· article· en· W2041118050 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Deakin, Robert Lam, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical resistivity and conductivityAntiferromagnetismGermaniumChemistryCondensed matter physicsMagnetoresistanceMagnetizationMagnetic susceptibilityTernary operationCrystallographyMagnetic fieldPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic and transport properties have been measured for the series of ternary rare-earth germanium antimonides RE 6 Ge 5 - x Sb 11+ x ( RE = La−Nd, Sm, Gd−Dy). All are metallic, with the members containing RE other than La displaying kinks in their resistivity vs temperature curves; the Tb and Dy members exhibit Kondo-like behavior with resistivity minima occurring at 10 and 150 K, respectively. For the compounds with RE = Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, the magnetic susceptibility and electrical resistivity measurements reveal long-range antiferromagnetic ordering with T N ≤ 22 K. At 2 K, the Ce, Pr, and Nd members undergo metamagnetic transitions at critical fields between 1.0 and 4.0 T, while the Gd member displays spin-flop behavior with H SF = 1.85 T and H C = 5.75 T. The single-crystal magnetoresistance of the Gd member below T N shows an orientationally dependent steplike behavior of resistivity as a function of field with changes in resistivity coinciding with the same critical fields observed in the magnetization measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207