La Neonatología, primera Área de Capacitación Específica de la Pediatría en España
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El pasado mes de agosto del 2014, el Boletin Oficial del Estado publico el Real Decreto 639/2014, de 25 de julio, por el que se regulan la troncalidad, la reespecializacion troncal y las areas de capacitacion especifica (denominadas «subespecialidades» en Europa). La Pediatria mantiene su formacion independiente de otros troncos. Respecto a las Areas de Capacitacion Especifica (ACE), se ha creado la de Neonatologia con acceso unico desde la especialidad de Pediatria1. Las ACE tienen un interes preferentemente asistencial pero requieren de una vertiente docente imprescindible para la correcta formacion del subespecialista, en nuestro caso el neonatologo. La ensenanza y la formacion en neonatologia estan bien organizadas en Australia, Estados Unidos y Canada. En Europa, el European Board of Pediatrics reconocio en 1997 al Working Group in Neonatology (WGN) de la European Society for Pediatric Research (ESPR). En agosto del 2001, el WGN-ESPR se convirtio en la European Society for Neonatology (ESN), reconocida por la Confederation of European Subspecialities in Pediatrics (CESP) como la organizacion representativa de todos los neonatologos europeos2. La ESN ha elaborado un programa de formacion para los neonatologos en Europa con el objetivo de armonizar los programas de formacion entre los distintos paises
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".