MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041232976 · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.26.14626

The human hematopoietic stem cell compartment is heterogeneous for CXCR4 expression

2000· article· en· W2041232976 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Rosu‐Myles, Lisa Gallacher, Barbara Murdoch, David A. Hess, Mike Keeney, David J. Kelvin, Leanne Dale, Stephen S. G. Ferguson, Dongmei Wu, Fraser Fellows, Mickie Bhatia

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph's HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCXCR4BiologyStem cellCell biologyHaematopoiesisCD34Stromal cellProgenitor cellInduced pluripotent stem cellChemokineChemokine receptorTransplantationImmunologyImmune systemCancer researchEmbryonic stem cellMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chemokine stromal derived factor-1alpha (SDF-1alpha) has been implicated recently in the chemotaxis of primitive human hematopoietic cells, suggesting that pluripotent human stem cells express the SDF-1alpha receptor, CXCR4. By using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy, we have identified and isolated primitive subsets of human CXCR4(+) and CXCR4(-) cells. Distinctions in the progenitor content and response to SDF-1alpha in vitro indicate that CXCR4(+) and CXCR4(-) cells represent discrete populations of primitive blood cells. The i.v. transplantation of these subfractions into immune-deficient mice established that both possess comparable engraftment capacity in vivo. Human myeloid, lymphoid, and primitive CD34(+) CXCR4(+) cells were present in chimeric animals transplanted with either subset, indicating that CXCR4(+) and CXCR4(-) stem cells have equivalent proliferative and differentiative abilities. Our study indicates that the human stem cell compartment is heterogeneous for CXCR4 expression, suggesting that the relationship between CXCR4 expression and stem cell repopulating function is not obligatory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207