GROWTH, SURVIVAL AND HEAT RESISTANCE OF <i>SALMONELLA</i> TYPHIMURIUM AND <i>ESCHERICHIA COLI</i> IN REGULAR AND OMEGA‐3 HENS EGG PRODUCTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Omega‐3 enriched eggs are currently produced by hens fed a flax diet. Since omega‐3 polyunsaturatedfatty acids are prone to oxidation, the addition of vitamin E is supplemented into the hen's diet as an antioxidant. Typically these eggs contain about 2 and 4 times more omega‐3 fatty acids and vitamin E, respectively compared to regular eggs. Since table eggs have a long history of association with foodborne salmonellosis, it was of interest to compare the growth and/or survival of several bacterial pathogens in omega‐3 and regular eggs. In this respect nalidixic‐resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium were inoculated into regular and omega‐3 hen's egg products (whole eggs, albumen, yolk) and incubated at 22, 8 and −20C. Time‐course studies indicated that by 72 h both Salmonella and E. coli levels increased by 7 logs at 22C in both types of whole egg. At 8C population levels for these bacteria both increased by approximately 3 logs at 6 weeks. In regular and omega‐3 yolks, salmonellae maintained at 22 and 8C for 48 h and 6 weeks increased by approximately 6 and 1.5 logs, respectively. E. coli levels were higher in egg yolk compared to Salmonella at both temperatures. Regardless of the yolk source, however, no significant (P > 0.05) differences in population levels were observed. Survival patterns of E. coli at −20C were not significantly (P > 0.05) different between whole egg sources. This trend was also observed in the yolks. For Salmonella no significant (P > 0.05) differences in survival were observed between yolk preparations maintained at −20C. Increasing the level of α‐tocopherol from c. 63 to 240 ppm in regular egg yolk, resulted in no significant (P > 0.05) differences in the growth of Salmonella at 22C. In addition, when the bacterium was heated in regular egg yolk amended with vitamin E at 56.5C, no significant (P > 0.05) difference was observed in resistance regardless of α‐tocopherol (55‐713 ppm) or total tochopherol (92–1238 ppm) level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".