Preliminary investigation of the vacuum pyrolysis of bituminous roofing waste materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The treatment of bituminous roofing waste materials by vacuum pyrolysis was tested in a pilot plant. The pyrolysis experiment was carried out batchwise at a temperature of 500°C and a total maximum pressure of 16 kPa. The amount of feedstock tested was 37 kg. Pyrolysis product yields were 52.3 wt.% oils, 31.2 wt.% solids, 14.4 wt.% pyrolysis gas, and 0.4 wt.% water. Losses were 1.7 wt.%. The pyrolysis oils have a gross calorific value of 42.7 MJ/kg and can be used as a heating fuel. The oil as a whole also represents a valuable material for petrochemical applications. The gas is rich in hydrocarbons and can be used as a make-up heat source (45.2 MJ/kg) for the thermal decomposition process. The solid residues exhibit a moderate calorific value of 17.5 MJ/kg and might find their way as a solid fuel in cement kilns. The nature of the minerals present in the solid residues, which amount to 49.7 wt.%, seems to be compatible with the cement composition. The vacuum pyrolysis technology is viewed as a potential solution to landfill and incineration of this waste construction material. Key words: construction, waste, shingles, bituminous, roofing, pyrolysis, fuels, environment, petrochemicals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".