MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041375061 · doi:10.1063/1.1829995

Theoretical insights into bone grafting silicon-stabilized α-tricalcium phosphate

2004· article· en· W2041375061 on OpenAlexafffund
Xilin Yin, M. J. Stott

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDopantMaterials scienceSiliconPhosphateDensity functional theoryDopingAb initioAb initio quantum chemistry methodsChemical engineeringCrystallographyComputational chemistryChemistryOrganic chemistryMoleculeMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon-stabilized tricalcium phosphate (Si-TCP) is an excellent bone graft substitute being totally resorbed by the body and replaced by natural bone. Experimental studies show that coatings and bulk ceramics based on this material have superior bioactivity not existing in traditional hydroxyapatite materials. However, the mechanisms through which Si and other dopants affect the properties are not known. We have performed ab initio density functional calculations to investigate the effect of Si dopants on these materials. The results show that Si2O7 species can be formed with weak binding in bulk alpha-TCP with an oxygen vacancy for charge compensation, and that 2SiO4 substitution for a pair of PO4 groups with an excess Ca2+ for charge compensation also leads to a stable structure. With an increase of Si concentration, the former is less bound and the latter becomes more stable, and is a good candidate for the form of Si in Si-stabilized alpha-TCP. The stability of the Si-substituted TCP seems to be determined by the P-P distance of the pair of PO4 groups to be replaced before substitution. The Si-doping leads to a pronounced change in the Ca-O bond lengths, and has little effect on the P-O bonds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207