MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041424333 · doi:10.1159/000092650

Community Genetics and Dignity in Diversity in the Quebec Network of Genetic Medicine

2006· review· en· W2041424333 on OpenAlexaffabout
Charles R. Scriver

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic Health Genomics · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewborn screeningGenetic counselingFamily medicineMedicineDignityMedical geneticsPopulationGenetic testingCarrier testingDiversity (politics)GerontologyPediatricsPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthGeneticsPrenatal diagnosisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Quebec Network of Genetic Medicine (QNGM), implemented in 1971, has been an integrated program of community genetics serving the population (approximately 7.5 million) of Quebec province in Canada. QNGM reported to the Minister of Social Affairs and operated under an umbrella of universal health insurance in the province. The Network's programs have been run by members of the four university medical schools of the province under the direction of a central committee. A global annual budget was awarded to QNGM from its inception. Among its many programs, QNGM supported: (1) two newborn screening programs (using blood and urine samples) for early diagnosis, treatment and research in phenylketonuria, hereditary tyrosinemia, congenital hypothyroidism, and in a large number of other hereditary metabolic diseases; (2) follow-up of confirmatory diagnostic tests at regional centers, followed by supervision of ambulatory treatment modalities; (3) carrier screening and reproductive counseling for Tay-Sachs and beta-thalassemia diseases; (4) a spectrum of feasibility (research) studies (e.g., screening for biotinidase deficiency, neuroblastoma, hemoglobinopathies, and cystic fibrosis) to inform policy decisions. QNGM performed economic analyses of its major programs and followed prevailing ethical guidelines. Its global budget and integrated structure terminated in 1994, although some of its programs continue independently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublic Health GenomicsSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207