Bridging structural biology and genetics by computational methods: An investigation into how the R774C mutation in the AR gene can result in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent structural studies of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the androgen receptor (AR) have raised more questions than answers, as most of the known pathogenic mutations of the AR gene causing androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) are not in the ligand-binding pocket. In this study, we have investigated one such pathogenic mutation, by examining details of its altered atomic structure using a computational technique of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations extended over 4 ns, effectively creating a 4D structural model. The mutation R774C, which is in the LBD of the AR gene, causes complete AIS (CAIS), producing ARs that have a unique thermolabile profile, being thermostable at 22 degrees C but thermolabile at 37 degrees C. We have therefore investigated this mutation by MD simulations at 293 K (20 degrees C), 300 K (27 degrees C), and 310 K (37 degrees C). The MD simulations indicate that: 1) the mutation causes local structural distortions, which result in changes in the shape of the ligand-binding pocket; 2) the mutation alters the dynamic nature of the protein and results in a more diverse conformational distribution of the ligand-binding pocket; and 3) the effect of the mutation on AR structure could be largely reversed by lowering the temperature at which the MD simulations were conducted. These results therefore strongly support the biochemical data, e.g., the mutants' inability to form AR-ligand complexes at 37 degrees C and its characteristic reversible thermolability, clearly indicating the value of such computational methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".