Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in Cervical Dystonia: Clinical Outcome in Four Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Report on the clinical results following bilateral globus pallidus interna deep brain stimulation in four patients (one female and three males) with severe cervical dystonia, mean age 48 years (range 37-67). METHODS: All four patients had failed extensive medical and botulinum toxin treatment. The mean duration of the disease was nine years (range 4-15 years). Patients were assessed pre and postoperatively using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). Pre-operatively, the mean TWSTRS total score was 43.2 (range 28-60.5). Posteroventral pallidal deep brain stimulators were inserted using MRI and microelectrode recording guidance. Last follow-up was 15 months for the four patients. RESULTS: Mean reduction in the TWSTRS total scores at last follow- up was 73% (range 61- 85%). Improvement in pain occurred soon after deep brain stimulation surgery. Motor improvement was delayed and prolonged over several months. Frequent adjustment in the stimulation parameters was necessary in the first three months. CONCLUSION: Bilateral pallidal stimulation is effective in management of selected cases of intractable cervical dystonia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".