MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041582427 · doi:10.1139/v00-183

Polymerization of 1-hexene catalyzed by Cp*TiMe<sub>3</sub>-B(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub>; a mechanistic and structural study

2001· article· en· W2041582427 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael C. Murray, Michael C. Baird

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMonomerPolymerizationPolymerPolymer chemistryTolueneGel permeation chromatography1-HexeneNattaCatalysisNMR spectra databaseHexeneNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyZiegler–Natta catalystDegree of polymerizationStereochemistryOrganic chemistryCopolymerSpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solutions of the Ziegler–Natta system Cp*TiMe 3 – B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 in toluene catalyze the polymerization of 1-hexene to mixtures of atactic poly-1-hexenes and complex oligomeric materials, which were characterized by 1 H and 13 C{ 1 H} NMR spectroscopy and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The polymer molecular weights and the relative proportions of polymers and oligomers vary with temperature, monomer:catalyst ratios, and degree of dilution and may generally be rationalized in terms of a conventional Ziegler–Natta mechanism. The 13 C{ 1 H} NMR spectra of the polymers exhibit resonances suggesting significant degrees of 2,1-insertions during propagation, while experiments utilizing Cp*Ti( 13 CH 3 ) 3 verify that initiation in toluene involves predominantly via 1,2-insertion of the first monomer unit but that 2,1-insertions occur up to 15–20% of the time in CH 2 Cl 2 . NMR experiments involving Cp*Ti( 13 CH 3 ) 3 demonstrate that both methyl groups in the presumed active species Cp*TiMe + 2 are incorporated into polymerKey words: titanium, polymers, polymerization, Ziegler–Natta

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207