MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Glucuronoxylomannan promotes the generation of antigen‐specific T regulatory cell that suppresses the antigen‐specific Th2 response upon activation

2008· article· en· W2041621260 on OpenAlexafffund
Tao Liu, Bai–Sui Feng, Shaoheng He, Taoyuan Zhang, Binquan Wang, Pingchang Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAntigenCell biologyImmunologyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T regulatory cells (Treg) have the capability to suppress the skewed immune response, but the generation of antigen (Ag)-specific Treg for therapeutic purpose is a challenge; the mechanism of Ag-specific Treg activation remains obscure. Here, we report that glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) is capable of promoting the development of human tolerogenic dendritic cells (DC). GXM-pulsed DCs increased the expression of forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) in naïve human CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells via activating Fc gamma receptor IIb and activator protein-1 and promoting the expression of transforming growth factor beta in dendritic cells. Furthermore, the conjugated complex of house dust mite Ag, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) 1, and GXM-pulsed DCs to drive the naïve human CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells to develop into the Der p 1-specific Tregs, which efficiently suppressed the Ag-specific Th2 responses. We conclude that GXM-conjugated specific Ag have the capacity to up-regulate the tolerogenic property of DCs and promote the generation of Ag-specific Tregs; the latter can be activated upon the re-exposure to specific Ag and suppress the skewed Ag-specific T helper (Th)2 responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular and Molecular MedicineSame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207