Distribution of highly repeated DNA sequences in species of the genus <i>Lens</i> Miller
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple-target fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was applied on mitotic chromosomes of seven Lens taxa using two highly repetitive sequences (pLc30 and pLc7) isolated from the cultivated lentil and the multigene families for the 18S-5.8S-25S (pTa71) and 5S rRNA (pTa794) from wheat simultaneously as probes. The number and location of pLc30 and pLc7 sites on chromosomes varied markedly among the species, whereas the hybridization pattern of 5S rDNA and 18S-5.8S-25S rDNA was less variable. In general, each species showed a typical FISH karyotype and few differences were observed among accessions belonging to the same species, except for the accessions of Lens odemensis. The most similar FISH karyotype to the cultivated lentil is that of Lens culinaris subsp. orientalis, whereas Lens nigricans and Lens tomentosus are the two species that showed the most divergent FISH patterns compared with all taxa for number and location of pLc30 and 18S-5.8S-25S rDNA sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".