Rehabilitation services for children: Therapists’ perceptions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine occupational therapists’ (OT) and physiotherapists’ (PT) perceptions regarding waiting time and the quality and quantity of the services they provide for children with disabilities. A survey was sent by post to all paediatric OTs and PTs in Quebec, Canada. A Service Delivery Questionnaire included questions regarding therapist/client characteristics, waiting times and quality and quantity of services provided. The Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP) rated use of family-centred care by responding clinicians. Waiting times were longest for OT services (p < 0.0001), speech/language interventions (p < 0.0001) and services in rehabilitation and community health centres (p < 0.0001). Quality of services was rated higher by PTs, experienced therapists and those using more methods of keeping up-to-date. The frequency and duration of services varied according to profession, type of clientele and setting. According to clinicians directly involved in the provision of rehabilitation services, long delays exist for children waiting for rehabilitation services, and perceived quality of services differs according to specific therapist and client characteristics. These findings will assist those involved in planning the distribution of co-ordinated rehabilitation services for children.El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar las percepciones de los terapistas ocupacionales (OT) y fisioterapeutas (PT) en relación al tiempo de espera, a la calidad y a la cantidad de los servicios que proveen a los niños con discapacidades. Se envío una encuesta por correo a todos los OT's y PT's en Québec, Canadá. El Service Delivery Questionnaire incluía preguntas en relación a las características terapista/cliente, el tiempo de espera y la calidad y la cantidad de los servicios brindados. La Measure of Process of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP) considero el uso del cuidado centrado en la familia por parte de los clínicos encuestados. Los tiempos de espera fueron más largos para los servicios de OT (p < 0.0001), así como para las intervenciones para habla/lenguaje (p < 0.0001), y para los servicios de rehabilitación y en centros de salud comunitarios (p < 0.0001). La calidad de los servicios fue estimada más alta para los PT's, también para los terapistas experimentados y para aquéllos que usaban más métodos para mantenerse actualizados. La frecuencia y la duración de los servicios variaron de acuerdo a la profesión, el tipo de clientela y la situación. De acuerdo a los clínicos directamente comprometidos en la provisión de los servicios de rehabilitación, existen retrasos largos para los niños que esperan los servicios de rehabilitación, y percibieron diferencias en la calidad de los servicios de acuerdo a características específicas de los terapistas y de los clientes. Estos hallazgos ayudarán a aquéllos comprometidos en la planeación y distribución de los servicios coordinados de rehabilitación para los niños.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it