General-model-space state-universal coupled-cluster methods for excited states: Diagonal noniterative triple corrections
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recently developed multireference, general-model-space, state-universal coupled-cluster approach considering singles and doubles (GMS SU CCSD) has been extended to account perturbatively for triples, similar to the ubiquitous single-reference CCSD(T) method. The effectiveness of this extension in handling of excited states and its ability to account for the static and nondynamic correlation effects when considering spin- and/or space-symmetry degenerate levels within the spin-orbital formalism is examined on the example of low-lying excitation energies of the C2, N2, and CO molecules and a comparison is made with the (N,N)-CCSD method used for the same purpose. It is shown that while the triple corrections are very effective in improving the absolute energies, they have only a modest effect on the corresponding excitation energies, which may be even detrimental if both the ground- and excited-state levels cannot be given a balanced treatment. While the triple corrections help to avoid the symmetry-breaking effects arising due to the use of the spin-orbital formalism, they are much less effective in this regard than the (N,N)-CCSD approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it