Adolescent Dating Violence Research and Violence Prevention: An Opportunity to Support Health Outcomes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The contributions to the special issues on adolescent dating violence that make up the Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma 19(5) and 19(6) reflect continued learning on the description, predictors, and patterns within adolescent relationship development. As reflected here, adolescent dating violence is at a level of concern that warrants enhanced focused research attention, as well as a renewed interest in testing interventions. As a relatively new area of inquiry and intervention, adolescent dating violence will benefit from a co-consideration of epidemiological and clinical research, as well as a move toward randomized control trials to direct those programs that show consistent positive impact across trials. With sufficient population data showing no change in dating violence victimization, it is imperative that adolescent dating violence be accorded due status as a public health issue, with import for future child maltreatment and adult intimate partner violence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it