MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041845710 · doi:10.1159/000276753

Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Ceftazidime in Cochlear Perilymph, Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma: A High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Study

2010· article· en· W2041845710 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueORL · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerilymphCerebrospinal fluidPharmacokineticsCeftazidimeChromatographyChemistryPenetration (warfare)High-performance liquid chromatographyMedicineAnesthesiaPharmacologyInternal medicineBiologyCochleaBacteriaAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pharmacokinetic profile of the antibiotic ceftazidime was established for perilymph, cerbrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma in 12 guinea pigs using the technique of high-performance liquid chromatography. The mean peak levels of 13.35 mg/l in perilymph and 140.54 mg/l in plasma were reached within the first hour after a single intravenous dose of 100 mg/kg. The CSF mean peak level of 5.36 mg/l, however, was not attained until 3 h after injection. The half-life was about 4 h in perilymph, more than 6 h in CSF and less than 2 h in plasma. Six hours following administration, the perilymph drug concentration remained higher than the plasma level. The study indicates that ceftazidime has excellent penetration into perilymph. It is concluded that ceftazidime should be a very useful agent in the treatment of bacterial labyrinthitis caused by susceptible organisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it