MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cavotricuspid Isthmus Conduction is Dependent on Underlying Anatomic Bundle Architecture: Observations Using a Maximum Voltage‐Guided Ablation Technique

2006· article· en· W2041890085 on OpenAlexaff
Damian Redfearn, Allan C. Skanes, Lorne J. Gula, Andrew D. Krahn, Raymond Yee, George J. Klein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAblationBundleCatheter ablationElectrical conduction system of the heartCardiologyInternal medicineElectrocardiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized an ablation strategy directly targeting muscle bundles might demonstrate functionally distinct "routes" of conduction, potentially shortening ablation times. BACKGROUND: Pathological study demonstrated that the cavotricuspid isthmus is composed of distinct anatomically defined bundles, many with intervening gaps of connective tissue. METHODS: A line was mapped in the "6 o'clock" region and bipolar electrogram amplitude measured during pullback. Zones of peak voltage were ablated first regardless of position. RF was delivered using either a 5-mm externally irrigated catheter, or an 8-mm nonirrigated catheter. The zone of largest remaining voltage was then sequentially targeted until conduction. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were recruited and followed for 7.9 +/- 1.9 months block occurred (mean age 64 +/- 11.6 years, male:female ratio 14:4). Bi-directional block was achieved in all patients with recurrence of atrial flutter in 1 patient. Mean total RF times was 4.7 +/- 2.8 minutes with a mean of 6.1 +/- 3.3 applications, procedure time was 127.3 +/- 37.7 minutes, and fluoroscopy time was 25.5 +/- 12.0 minutes. Two patterns of block were observed in the study group. Pattern A described no change in conduction times until block, observed in 6 (33%); pattern B described a stepwise block with discrete "jumps," observed in 12 (67%). CONCLUSIONS: An ablation strategy targeting high-voltage isthmus electrograms obviates the need for a complete anatomic line. This finding together with discrete "jumps" during ablation is consistent with the concept of conduction over discrete bundles rather than a diffuse sheet of muscle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular ElectrophysiologySame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207