Bone mineral density in juvenile dermatomyositis: Assessment using dual x‐ray absorptiometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the bone mineral density (BMD) status of our juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) population and to compare the frequency of osteopenia in patients with active disease requiring corticosteroids with that in patients with inactive disease who are not receiving corticosteroids. METHODS: Medical charts of all children diagnosed as having juvenile DM at our institution between 1989 and 1999 were reviewed for demographic and clinical data, including disease activity and duration of corticosteroid therapy. BMD measurements of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) were performed using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Z scores were calculated from the BMD data for comparison with published normative data. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were assessed: 10 with active disease, and 5 with inactive disease who had not taken corticosteroids for an average of 6.0 years (range 3.4-8.1 years). Baseline BMD measurements demonstrated osteopenia or frank osteoporosis in the majority of patients, including 6 of the 10 patients with active disease and 4 of the 5 patients whose disease was in remission. Fourteen patients had serial BMD measurements. Persistent or worsening osteopenia was documented in all patients who had ongoing active disease, except for 3 patients who had been treated with bisphosphonates because of vertebral compression fractures. CONCLUSION: Osteopenia is common in patients with juvenile DM, and it usually worsens with ongoing disease. It can persist for many years after the disease enters remission. Bisphosphonates appeared to beneficially affect bone mineralization in our patients. Treatment to prevent the long-term complications of osteoporosis in patients with juvenile DM should be considered and requires further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".