MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041905576 · doi:10.1080/03014223.2002.9518288

A new longjaw galaxias species (Teleostei: Galaxiidae) from the Kauru River, North Otago, New Zealand

2002· article· de· W2041905576 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R. M. McDowall, Jonathan M. Waters

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Journal of Zoology · 2002
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of AlbertaDirectorate for Biological SciencesUniversity of WaikatoNorth Carolina State University
KeywordsSympatric speciationTributaryBiologyMeristicsDorsal finTeleosteiGalaxiasPopulationFish finEcologyType localityZoologyTaxonomy (biology)DorsumGeographyFisheryAnatomyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A population of “longjaw galaxias”, long known to be present in the Kauru River, a small tributary of the Kakanui River in North Otago, is shown to be a distinct species using both morphological and molecular characters. It is described here as Galaxias cobitinis n. sp., which has: origin of anal fin anterior to that of dorsal fin, only 15 principal caudal fin rays, only 5 pelvic fin rays, and only 51–53 vertebrae. In these and other morphological characters it differs from G. prognathus Stokell. One specimen from the Hakataramea River, lower Waitaki River system appears to also be G. cobitinis . Molecular evidence suggests long isolation from the Kauru River of “true” longjaw galaxias G. prognathus and from rivers draining the high Southern Alps (type locality: Wilberforce River, tributary of the Rakaia River), perhaps dating back as long as 11–4 million years ago (late Miocene‐early Pliocene). This prolonged isolation contrasts with hypothesised more recent isolation of populations of the Galaxias vulgaris species group in the Kakanui River from other populations of that species group. Thus, sympatric species of Galaxias have contrasting biogeographic histories in the Kakanui River.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand Journal of ZoologySame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207