MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041905793 · doi:10.1139/g06-019

Characterization of a maize isochromosome 8S·8S

2006· article· en· W2041905793 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Weichang Yu, Fangpu Han, Akio Kato, James A. Birchler

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIsochromosomeBiologyMeiosisGeneticsTelophaseCentromereKaryotypeAnaphaseMetaphaseChromosomeFluorescence in situ hybridizationMitosisSomatic cellDicentric chromosomeMeiosis IIGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An isochromosome was found in the maize HiII Parent B line during somatic karyotyping with a multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) system. Cytological analyses showed that it pairs with the short arm of chromosome 8 during the pachytene stage of meiosis. The chromosome 8 short arm origin of this isochromosome was also confirmed by FISH at mitotic metaphase. Knob heterochromatin signals were present at the short arms of chromosome 8 when subjected to prolonged exposure and also observed at both ends of the isochromosome. This isochromosome can be a univalent or a trivalent by pairing with the normal chromosome 8 short arms during meiosis. At anaphase and telophase, the isochromosome lagged behind other chromosomes. It had a transmission rate of 17%-20% from both male and female gametes. One plant homozygous for the isochromosome contained 2 isochromosomes that differed in the quantity of their CentC centromere repeat sequence. Both variations of the isochromosome were transmitted to the next generation. Because the 2 isochromosomes should be identical by descent, these observations document a radical change in copy number of the centromere repeat array within 1 generation. Plants with 1 isochromosome were not normal as compared with the original HiII Parent B plants. Those that contained a pair of this isochromosome (6 total copies of 8S) were even more abnormal and had reduced fertility. The results indicate the ability of the somatic karyotyping system to recognize and characterize chromosomal aberrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207