MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041974758 · doi:10.1508/cytologia.75.289

Male Meiotic Studies in Some Plants of Polypetalae from Dalhousie Hills (Himachal Pradesh)

2010· article· en· W2041974758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shubhpreet Kaur, Vijay Kumar Singhal, Puneet Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueCYTOLOGIA · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity Grants Commission
KeywordsBiologyPollenBotanyMeiosisPloidyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Male meiosis and pollen fertility studies have been performed in 35 species belonging to 25 genera and 13 families of Polypetalae from the Dalhousie hills. Impatiens laxiflora (n=6) was counted chromosomally for the first time. Corydalis cornuta (n=8), Erysimum hieracifolum (n=16), Arenaria serpyllifolia (n=10), Drymaria diandra (n=13), Geranium lucidum (n=14), Nasturtium officinale (n=16), Geum roylei (n=21) and Chaerophyllum reflexum (n=11) are worked out chromosomally for the first time in India. New cytotypes are recorded for Thalictrum saniculiforme (n=14), Drymaria diandra (n=13), Geranium lucidum (n=14) and Chaerophyllum reflexum (n=11). Present chromosome counts for the rest of the species substantiate earlier reports by other researchers. Intraspecific diploid (n=12) and tetraploid (n=24) cytotypes recorded presently from Dalhousie hills in Oxalis corniculata are morphologically indistinguishable. The phenomenon of cytomixis involving inter PMC (pollen mother cell) migration of chromatin material has been observed in Ranunculus diffusus (n=16), Thalictrum foliolosum (n=7), T. saniculiforme (n=14), Gypsophila cerastioides (n=15), Oxalis corniculata (n=24), Murraya koenigii (n=9), Geum roylei (n=21), Potentilla atrisanguinea (n=21) and Pimpinella diversifolia (n=9). Cytomixis in these species results in various meiotic abnormalities and heterogeneous sized pollen grains. In the remaining species, the meiosis is normal, leading to high pollen fertility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCYTOLOGIASame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207