Bibliographic record
Abstract
AGU Chapman Conference on Dynamics of the Earth's Radiation Belts and Inner Magnetosphere; St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, 17–22 July 2011 Earth's radiation belts were discovered by James Van Allen and colleagues in 1958 using data from the Explorer I satellite. Since then, the Van Allen belts have been under extensive theoretical and experimental investigation. Because highly energetic (relativistic) electrons generated in the outer radiation zone during geomagnetically disturbed times can damage orbiting satellites, Earth's radiation belts are regarded as a serious space weather hazard. The emerging science of space weather has fueled a resurgence of interest in radiation belt physics in the past 10 years. This will culminate in 2012 with the launch of NASA's Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) twin satellite mission, which will make in situ measurements of the radiation belts. Shortly after 2012 are also planned launches of the Japanese Energization and Radiation in Geospace (ERG) satellite and the Russian mission RESONANCE, both designed to probe Earth's radiation belts. Thus, 2012–2013 promises to be an exciting and pivotal period in radiation belt science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".