MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041992506 · doi:10.2118/146624-ms

A New Approach to Deepwater Drilling Data Analysis Offers Enhanced Real Time Capabilities in a Post Macondo World

2011· article· en· W2041992506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Greve

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffshore drillingDrillingShetlandSituation awarenessSubmarine pipelineData qualitySoftware deploymentComputer scienceReal-time dataControl roomEngineeringGeologyOperations managementOceanographyWorld Wide WebCivil engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Deepwater drilling activity in the Gulf of Mexico is no longer a given in the aftermath of the BP Macondo blowout. The new and ever evolving process to apply for drilling permits and operate now greatly depends on: Optimal well designs certified for accuracy by Professional Engineers Thorough real-time monitoring of pertinent surface and down-hole data, and Deployment of new joint industry well capping and spill containment equipment for response to a blowout. This paper makes no attempt to address the topics in items 1 and 3. In regard to item 2, a new method for loading and analyzing live time and depth data has shown merit during recent 2010 trials on two deepwater wells, one offshore eastern Canada and the other offshore west of the Shetland Islands. Rapid data access and standardized visualization of high resolution time, depth, and survey data is vital to insure that the occasional well control event doesn't become today's worldwide news headline. Deepwater drilling management demands a highly trained staff with timely access to data in a format easily used by the key decision makers wherever they are. After the BP Macondo blowout, the news frenzy and blame game quickly showed the entire world that all operators may not be truly partnered with their rig and service suppliers in cooperative efforts to safely drill and complete the high rate wells which have historically made the deepwater Gulf of Mexico an attractive area to explore. After the blowout, the gathering of high quality data from remote real time data centers was quickly elevated to critical status for use in the government's investigation. High quality data collection and interpretation should always be managed with utmost attention to detail in light of the inherent risks of deepwater drilling and the fact that the industry simply cannot afford another incident. After a major disaster in any business sector, new technology is always promoted as a key ingredient to avoid and manage any future accident. The oil industry must now meet the challenge of proving to the regulators charged with enforcement that our organizations have the capability for creating exacting pre-drill well plans, managing and prudently using real-time information. and responsibly responding to any well control event up to and including a blowout.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207