Homocysteine and Stroke Prevention: Have the Trials Settled the Issue?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent publicity surrounding disappointing results of clinical trials of homocysteine lowering has led to the claim that 'homocysteine is dead'. However, there is strong evidence that elevated plasma total homocysteine is an important independent risk factor, and the highly plausible biological rationale is the following: total homocysteine increases coagulation, impairs endothelial function, increases oxidative stress and low density lipoprotein oxidation, and treatment with vitamins reverses these effects and halts progression of carotid plaque. Some studies have shown clinical benefit of vitamin therapy in coronary angioplasty and peripheral vascular disease. It has recently become apparent that vitamin B12 absorption is impaired in the elderly, and that metabolic B12 deficiency is much commoner than would be appreciated by statistical definitions of 'normal' serum B12; higher doses of B12 and perhaps other therapies such as betaine and thiols may be needed to achieve adequate reductions of total homocysteine. It remains likely that effective lowering of total homocysteine will reduce stroke and other vascular events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.160 | 0.301 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.027 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.030 | 0.023 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".