Significance of IGFBP-4 in the Development of Fetal Growth Restriction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Animal studies suggest dysregulation of IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-4 is significant in the development of FGR, although human data are lacking. We postulated that IGFBP-4 is expressed at the maternal fetal interface and plays a role in regulating IGF bioavailability. Thus, maternal serum levels of IGFBP-4 may be associated with complications of abnormal placental growth and development including FGR. METHODS: Circulating levels of IGFBP-4 and its protease, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), were examined in healthy pregnancies. Their expression in villi and bed as possible sources of the circulating products were examined by immunohistochemistry. From the large Ottawa and Kingston (OaK) Birth Cohort, a nested case-control study was conducted to examine circulating levels of IGBP-4, PAPP-A, IGF-I, and IGF-II by Western blot in early gestation in 36 women who went on to develop FGR and 36 controls having normal-weight babies. RESULTS: IGFBP-4 was elevated in early pregnancy compared with nonpregnant women and women in later pregnancy, consistent with the presence of abundant extravillous trophoblasts and decidual cells that highly expressed IGFBP-4. High expression of PAPP-A was observed in extravillous trophoblasts and decidual cells in early pregnancy but hardly detectable in the circulation at this time, suggesting maternal circulating PAPP-A originates more likely from syncytiotrophoblasts. Increased IGFBP-4 in the maternal circulation in early pregnancy was associated with the development of FGR [0.48 (0.28-0.74) in control vs. 1.22 (0.66-1.65) in FGR; odds ratio = 22 (95% confidence interval = 2.7-181)]. No difference was observed in circulating PAPP-A, IGF-I and IGF-II in the FGR vs. control group. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the role of IGFBP-4 in regulating IGF bioavailability and provide new clues for the prevention and treatment of FGR, raising the possibility of clinical use of IGFBP-4 as an early biomarker for this condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".